On Monday, before OSDC 2015 got started, some of us attendees were sitting around a bar in Salamanca Place and the topic of Australia’s new Metadata Retention legislation came up, as it tends to.
“It’s the first step onto a slippery slope!”, I spluttered into my espresso martini. “And expensive and ineffective anyway!” (espresso martinis tend to have that effect on me). “Even our Minister for Communications, uh, Prime Minister uses a VPN and encrypted chat clients these days.”
For the moment, the explanation of the legislation says:
Paragraph 187A(4)(b) puts beyond doubt that service providers are not required to keep information about subscribers’ web browsing history.
… but the wording of 187A(4)(b) is clearly written by lawyers not engineers:
(4) This section does not require a service provider to keep, or cause to be kept:
(b) information that:
(i) states an address to which a communication was sent on the internet, from a telecommunications device, using an internet access service provided by the service provider; and
(ii) was obtained by the service provider only as a result of providing the service; or
Note: This paragraph puts beyond doubt that service providers are not required to keep information about subscribers’ web browsing history.
Back to Salamanca …
“Anyway”, I declaimed, “all it would take to make the whole web metadata logging thing intractable would be for someone to inject some code into web pages which caused a whole bunch of random IPs to get prodded every time someone loaded a page.”
“You should implement that and do a lightning talk on it”, exclaimed Ben Dechrai, appearing in a cloud of Buzzconf stickers. “Dunno”, I said, considering another martini. “I’ve got a talk to prepare already, and I might actually want to listen to someone else talking for a change too …”
“How about I implement it and give you the credit”, offers Ben.
“How about you implement it and I get another drink …” I suggested, heading back to the bar …
Launch at OSDC
So to cut a long story short, Ben went and implemented it in his copious free time the next day.
On Thursday’s lightning talks at OSDC 2015, he announced squawk.cc, which by this point had not just a domain name but a github repo, a logo contributed by Donna Benjamin and an SSL certificate is on its way from Let’s Encrypt.
Why do you want to destroy Western Civilization, and also won’t somebody think of the children?
The point of Squawk isn’t to destroy Western Civilization As We Know It, it is to demonstrate the uselessness and invasiveness of trying to log this kind of thing en masse.
As it stands, Squawk is rather dumb and picks addresses completely at
random from the top few Australian A-class netblocks, doing a single
GET / request via AJAX. It could be made a lot better. Why not make a